Terug naar Encyclopedie

Evidence in Prohibited Dismissal in Rijswijk: How Do You Prove Discrimination?

Prove discrimination in Rijswijk with documents, witnesses, and reversal of the burden of proof. Indirect evidence suffices according to the Supreme Court, ideal for local dismissal cases.

2 min leestijd

Evidence in Prohibited Dismissal in Rijswijk: How Do You Prove Discrimination?

In Rijswijk, with its thriving business parks such as Zuiderpoort and near The Hague, we often see dismissal issues at local companies. In cases of suspected prohibited dismissal, it revolves around solid evidence. This article explains how you demonstrate discrimination with tools that work for Rijswijk employees.

Reversal of the Burden of Proof in the Region

Since the Work and Security Act (WWZ), reversal of the burden of proof applies (Article 7:670 paragraph 3 of the Dutch Civil Code). For 'sensitive' dismissal reasons, such as at Rijswijk tech firms or government-related jobs, the employer must prove the absence of discrimination. The sub-district court in The Hague, competent for Rijswijk, applies this strictly.

Practical Means of Evidence for Rijswijk

  • Documents: Exit interviews from Rijswijk offices, emails, and HR files from local employers.
  • Witnesses: Colleagues from Zuiderpoort companies who recognize discrimination patterns.
  • Statistics: Disproportionate dismissals among migrants or women in Rijswijk sectors such as IT and logistics.
  • Medical file: Essential in sickness claims, often relevant for physical work in the region.

The Supreme Court recently confirmed that indirect evidence is sufficient, as in cases from the Hague region. Build a strong file, consult a local labour lawyer in Rijswijk or The Hague, and win your claim. (248 words)