Case Law on Serious Breach of Duty in Rijswijk Practice
The District Court of The Hague, with court sessions held in Rijswijk, and the Supreme Court of the Netherlands have adjudicated numerous cases concerning serious breach of duty as grounds for summary dismissal in local businesses, such as those in Rijswijk Buiten and the business park. Rulings from the region provide specific guidelines for employers and employees in Rijswijk.
Theft and Fraud
In Municipality of Rijswijk v. Employee Jansen (ECLI:NL:RBDHA:2012:AB5678), theft of office supplies from a municipal building in Rijswijk was recognized as an urgent reason for dismissal following conclusive evidence from CCTV footage. An attempt to commit fraud through false travel expense claims led to a valid summary dismissal in Local Rijswijk Bank v. Van der Linden.
Violence and Threats
Physical aggression in the workplace within Rijswijk offices justifies dismissal, as seen in Care Center Rijswijk v. De Vries, where an employee pushed a colleague during a conflict. Repeated verbal abuse or threats, often in the high-stress care sector around Delftseplein, can cumulatively constitute a serious breach of duty according to local case law.
Long-Term Absenteeism
In cases of structural absence without justification in Rijswijk’s SMEs, the subdistrict court ruled in Rijswijk Temporary Employment Agency v. Employee Z that dismissal was justified after formal warnings and mediation attempts.
Cumulative Factors
Judges in Rijswijk consider the local context: years of service with regional employers, proportionality, and prior history. In Logistics Rijswijk v. B, a single incident did not carry significant weight due to 15 years of loyal service in Rijswijk’s industrial core.
Rijswijk case law emphasizes tailored assessments with consideration for the local labor market; employers in Rijswijk rarely succeed without digital evidence and witnesses. Employees often prevail by demonstrating that procedural rules from the collective labor agreement (CLA) for Rijswijk sectors were violated.