Terug naar Encyclopedie

Risks and Pitfalls in Mutual Consent Termination in Rijswijk

Pitfalls such as missing evidence and pressure in tenancy termination in Rijswijk: avoid risks with smart clauses and attention to local Huurteam support.

2 min leestijd

Mutual consent termination of tenancy offers benefits for tenants and landlords in Rijswijk, but harbours serious risks, especially in neighbourhoods like Innen and Oud-Rijswijk where social housing is dominant. A common pitfall is the lack of written documentation, which leads to denial of agreements (article 7:210 BW). Tenants in Rijswijk risk homelessness if the landlord withdraws, without judicial intervention via the Hague District Court. Landlords may be liable for double rent if the property in Delftsestraatweg or Plaspoelpolder is not vacated. Exercising pressure, such as reporting to the local Huurteam Rijswijk, renders the agreement void, as ruled in recent cases by the Huurcommissie. Check for ongoing subsidies or benefits via the Rijswijk social services; termination may affect allowances. For housing association tenancies such as those from Vidomes, stricter Huurcommissie scrutiny applies with local priority. Avoid oral promises regarding repairs or deposit refunds in Rijswijk rental properties. Legal tip: add a revocation clause for a 14-day cooling-off period, in line with Rijswijk rental market rules. In case of non-performance, article 6:74 BW provides for dissolution. Practice in Rijswijk: tenants often win cases if pressure is proven via the Huurteam. Document everything with emails, photos and contact with Woonbron or Trivire. The free Huurteam Rijswijk provides advice to minimise risks and effectively protect both parties.