Terug naar Encyclopedie

Recusal and Exclusion in Objection Procedures in Rijswijk

Recusal of objection committee members in Rijswijk is possible in cases of bias (art. 7:17 Awb). Grounds: conflict of interest or conduct, such as in local Plaspoelpolder cases. The request suspends the procedure until a decision is made.

2 min leestijd

Recusal and Exclusion in Objection Procedures in Rijswijk

In objection procedures with the municipality of Rijswijk, a member of the objection committee may be recused if bias is suspected, on the basis of Article 7:17 Awb. This safeguards the integrity of the advisory process, specifically in local matters such as spatial planning or permits in neighborhoods like Innen or Oud-Rijswijk.

Grounds for Recusal in Rijswijk

  • Personal interests: Family ties with local entrepreneurs or financial involvement in Rijswijk projects.
  • Prior statements: Previous public positions on controversies such as the redesign of the Herenweg.
  • Appearances of bias: Improper conduct during hearings in Rijswijk town hall.

Procedure with the Rijswijk Objection Committee

The objector submits the recusal request to the chairperson of the Rijswijk objection committee. If granted, the municipality immediately appoints a replacement from the pool of independent advisors. The decision is irrevocable, binding, and in practice suspends the procedure until the hearing in Rijswijk is resumed.

Local example: In a recent case concerning a building permit in the Plaspoelpolder, a suspected conflict of interest led to successful recusal, which strengthened trust in Rijswijk's administration. Recusal remains rare (less than 5% of the approximately 200 annual objections), but is essential for proper administration in accordance with the Awb.